User talk:A.A Prinon

This user is busy at school and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please leave a new message.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A.A Prinon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere.

First, @Lugnuts: Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one this and the other this. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is hounding? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will never be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you are being positive. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, one of my articles got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made this and this edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appears to be a message to Lugnuts rather than an unblock request. – bradv^🍁 01:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition, think a little. such as- If I hadn't made this edit, would people know about this significant record. Again if I didn't made this edit would general readers know about the information. Hence, I am always editing here for the betterment of WP, not to cause you distress particularly. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 06:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @আফতাবুজ্জামান: for appreciating my contributions on Wikipedia, by emailing me. You are perhaps the only person to do so. When I had 4 interactions in 4 days (out of my about 320 edits in these 4 days) with a user, admins have blocked me claiming that I was hounding. This is completely biased accusation, or is it enough to justify a block for only 4 interactions, when these types of edits were always made by me. Note: I have not even evaded my block by editing with another account in this meantime, which CheckUsers will able to verify using behavioural or technical data. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 05:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think many are enjoying seeing me blocked. 2021 Bangladeshi cricket season, 2021 Arachas Super T20 Trophy, 2021–22 National Cricket League etc many articles created by me are not being updated when I am blocked. So, if I were unblocked, I would just cause damage or disruption, right? @Lugnuts: Do you keep track of such news like this and this? And now, the project is being benefited when most important articles of the project are not being updated. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 05:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vinoo Mankad Trophy

A tag has been placed on Category:Vinoo Mankad Trophy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current captains of associate national cricket teams of Americas region

Template:Current captains of associate national cricket teams of Americas region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cory McKenna

Hello, A.A Prinon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cory McKenna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dhaka Platoon squad

Hello, A.A Prinon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dhaka Platoon squad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dhaka Platoon seasons has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dhaka Platoon seasons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arachas Super 20 Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arachas Super 20 Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dhaka Platoon has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dhaka Platoon has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2021 Hong Kong Women's Premier League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Hong Kong Women's Premier League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Hong Kong Women's Premier League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Batagur baska (talk) 06:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Domestic cricket competitions in 2021 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Domestic cricket competitions in 2021 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Batagur baska (talk) 06:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]